临时仲裁制度在我国引入的研究  

Study on the Introduction of Ad Hoc Arbitration System in China

作　　者：王凌霄 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学国际法学院,上海

出　　处：《争议解决》2024年第1期43-50,共8页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：临时仲裁是与机构仲裁相对应的一种仲裁形式。只要某仲裁协议中未指定某仲裁机构管辖并接受其程序上的管理,便归入临时仲裁的范畴。临时仲裁在内地的引入具备了必要性条件和可行性条件。临时仲裁有着其固有的法律优势和无可替代的市场价值。自贸区政策呈现出在一定范围内承认临时仲裁的倾向。新发布的《仲裁法》意见稿明确提出了“专设仲裁庭仲裁”的概念,虽然在特别规定中仍存在一些模糊或者空白之处,但仍然为临时仲裁的引入提供了有力的支撑。同时,国内的法律水平和法治氛围已经达到了建立临时仲裁制度的外部要求。Ad hoc arbitration is a form of arbitration that corresponds to institutional arbitration. As long as an arbitration agreement does not designate an arbitral institution as having jurisdiction and accepting its procedural administration, it is categorized as ad hoc arbitration. The introduction of ad hoc arbitration in the mainland is both necessary and feasible. Ad hoc arbitration has its inherent legal advantages and irreplaceable market value. The FTZ policy shows a tendency to recognize ad hoc arbitration to a certain extent. The newly released opinion draft of the “Arbitration Law” clearly puts forward the concept of “arbitration by an ad hoc arbitral tribunal”, which, although there are still some ambiguities or gaps in the special provisions, still provides strong support for the introduction of ad hoc arbitration. At the same time, the domestic legal level and the atmosphere of the rule of law have met the external requirements for the establishment of ad hoc arbitration system.

关 键 词：临时仲裁 机构仲裁 《仲裁法》 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]