检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:熊亦欣
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学知识产权学院,上海
出 处:《争议解决》2024年第1期231-236,共6页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:商标平行进口行为在涉及商标侵权的同时,还引发了不正当竞争纠纷,而相关判决未对商标平行进口行为进行充分的不正当竞争分析。本文聚焦商标平行进口行为本身,以反不正当竞争法的规范方法,从“原告存在值得保护的竞争利益、原被告存在具体竞争关系、被告实施损害该竞争利益的行为”三个层面出发判断商标平行进口行为是否具有不正当性,并进一步通过对消费者福利、商业道德以及自由竞争三方面的考量进行竞争评估,判断是否应当以反不正当竞争法规制商标平行进口行为,以期为解决商标平行进口纠纷提供新的思路。Parallel import of trademarks not only involves trademark infringement disputes, but also leads to unfair competition disputes, and the relevant judgment has not carried out sufficient analysis of unfair competition. This paper focuses on the act of parallel import of trademarks itself, and uses the normative method of anti-unfair competition law to judge whether the act of parallel import of trademarks is unfair from three aspects: “the plaintiff has competitive interests worth protecting, the original defendant has specific competitive relationship, and the defendant has committed an act that damages the competitive interests”. And further through the “consumer welfare, business ethics and free competition” three aspects of the competition evaluation, judge whether the anti-unfair competition law should regulate the trademark parallel import behavior, in order to provide a new way to solve the trademark parallel import disputes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33