检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周杨
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海
出 处:《争议解决》2024年第1期625-630,共6页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:数字时代,个人信息的社会价值被挖掘,个人信息处理者包括政府机关和企业,面对数字时代个人信息侵权的特点,“私益救济”难以维护公益,“公法保护”保护不力。在这样的背景下,《个人信息保护法》引入了公益诉讼介入个人信息保护环节,但现行立法主要立足于防止企业等私主体滥用个人信息的民事公益诉讼。而政府机关作为大型数据处理者之一,在行政过程中也可能侵害到个人信息,因此有必要引进行政公益诉讼来弥补其中缺漏。从理论上看,个人信息存在有其社会利益属性,需要行政法的保护,而现行《行政诉讼法》也为个人信息保护的行政公益诉讼留下了理论余地。In the digital era, the social value of personal information has been excavated, personal information processors include government organs and enterprises. In this context, the “Law on the Protection of Personal Information” introduces public interest litigation into the protection of personal information, but the current legislation is mainly based on preventing enterprises and other private subjects from misusing personal information in civil public interest litigation. Government, as the biggest data processor, may infringe on personal information in the administrative process, so it is necessary to introduce administrative public interest litigation to make up for the omission. Theoretically, personal information has its social interest attribute and needs the protection of administrative law. But the current “Administrative Procedure Law” also leaves a theoretical leeway for personal information protection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.230.250