检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:熊利娟
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学国际金融法律学院,上海
出 处:《争议解决》2024年第2期676-681,共6页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:“诉责险”近年来在民事诉讼保全程序中得到广泛应用,为解决“执行难”问题提供助力。与其广泛应用前景相左的是实务中仍存在大量尚待明确的问题。本文通过大量案例研究厘清“诉责险”费用承担问题焦点。从“诉责险”的性质和功能定位的角度进行分析,认为“诉责险”本质上是申请人(原告)为避免自身因保全申请错误面临侵权赔偿风险而购买的责任保险,在保险范围内将赔偿风险转嫁给保险人。“诉责险”保险费支出并不是其为促成保全申请的必要支出,其在保险交易中也获得了对价保障,并不存在损失,因此不应主张由被申请人(被告)承担“诉责险”费用。Litigation property preservation liability insurance has been widely used in civil litigation preservation procedures in recent years, providing assistance in solving the problem of difficult executions. Contrary to the prospect of its wide application, there are still a large number of problems in practice that have yet to be clarified. In this paper, through a large number of case studies to clarify the litigation property preservation liability insurance costs bear the focus of the problem. From the perspective of the nature and functional positioning of the insurance analysis, that the litigation liability insuranceis essentially the applicant (plaintiff) in order to avoid the risk of tort compensation for their own errors in the preservation of the application to purchase liability insurance, within the scope of the insurance will be the risk of compensation Shift the risk of compensation to the insurer within the scope of insurance. The premium expenses of the insurance are not necessary for the application for preservation, and the applicant has obtained the protection of consideration in the insurance transaction, and there is no loss, so it should not be claimed that the defendant should bear the premiums of the litigation liability insurance.
关 键 词:诉讼保全 诉讼财产保全责任保险 诉责险
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38