检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田靖溪
机构地区:[1]上海政法学院刑事司法学院,上海
出 处:《争议解决》2024年第2期700-705,共6页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:当诽谤遭遇互联网络,便成为网络空间中侵犯他人人身权利的新问题和新现象。与传统的诽谤罪相比,大数据时代下的网络诽谤犯罪具有匿名性和不确定性、现实性和持续性以及双重侵害性的特点。网络诽谤不仅对当事人的人格和名誉造成侵害,更损害了社会秩序和国家利益,如何应对网络诽谤行为是我们当前面临的新挑战。而现阶段的治理方式、治理资源及治理机制已经无法满足日益猖狂的网络诽谤犯罪行为了。对此,应先厘清网络诽谤“情节严重”的内涵,后加强公诉与自诉的衔接以及政府监管以共同实现网络诽谤犯罪的治理。When defamation encounters the Internet, it becomes a new problem and a new phenomenon that violates the personal rights of others in cyberspace. Compared with traditional defamation offences, cyber defamation crimes in the era of big data are characterised by anonymity and uncertainty, reality and continuity, and double infringement. Network defamation not only infringes on the personality and reputation of the person concerned, but also damages the social order and national interests, and how to deal with network defamation is a new challenge we are currently facing. At this stage, the governance methods, resources and mechanisms can no longer meet the increasingly rampant cyber defamation offences. In this regard, we should first clarify the connotation of “aggravated circumstances” of cyber defamation, and then strengthen the interface between public and private prosecution as well as governmental supervision in order to jointly realise the governance of cyber defamation crimes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7