商标许可人的产品质量监督责任分析  

Analysis of Trademark Licensor’s Responsibility for Product Quality Supervision

作　　者：边祥龙 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,知识产权学院,上海

出　　处：《争议解决》2024年第2期792-799,共8页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：现行《商标法》第四十三条规定商标许可人应当监督被许可人使用该注册商标的产品质量,但是在具体内容上却缺少相关的法律规范。商标许可建立在商标的品质保障功能的基础之上。商标许可人应当秉持行为标准,综合监督过程中行为的多方表现以证明其满足了该责任要求。因为商标许可人与消费者间存在的信赖关系,针对产品质量导致的责任,商标许可人一般应当承担责任,除非其履行了合理的监督行为或所做许可为推广型许可。而在《商标法修订草案(征求意见稿)》中的新增的商标许可人的行政责任,存在责任前提不合理、惩罚基数不当、双重惩罚等问题,鉴于商标许可人所需承担责任已基本足够,此处新规已无必要。Article 43 of the current Trademark Law stipulates that a trademark licensor shall supervise the quality of the product for which the licensee is using the registered trademark, but there is a lack of relevant legal norms on the specific content. Trademark licensing is based on the quality assurance function of the trademark. Trademark licensor should uphold the standard of conduct, comprehensive supervision process of behavior of multiple performance to prove that it meets the requirements of the responsibility. Because of the relationship of trust between the trademark licensor and the consumer, the trademark licensor should generally be held liable for liability resulting from the quality of the product, unless it performs reasonable supervision or the license is a promotional license. The new administrative liability of trademark licensors in the Draft Revision of the Trademark Law (Exposure Draft) has problems such as unreasonable liability preconditions, inappropriate penalty bases, and double penalties, etc. Given that the liability of trademark licensors is already basically sufficient, the new regulation is no longer necessary here.

关 键 词：商标许可 产品质量监督责任 信赖利益 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]