检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯晨嫣
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,国际法学院,上海
出 处:《争议解决》2024年第4期394-399,共6页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:为了研究我国自2011年《涉外民事关系法律适用法》通过至今在实践中的适用情况以及“回家去”趋势的变化,本文从“回家去”趋势的提出和成因引入,继而探讨了域外侵权法律适用中的“回家去”趋势。在发现上述情况的基础上,本文对侵权冲突法律适用中的“回家去”趋势的提出和背后的成因进行分析,并从上海地区案件的角度和国际化的角度两个方面论证得出“回家去”趋势应当被适当限制的结论。本论文最后从立法和司法两个角度对我国涉外一般侵权冲突规范提出建议,对我国侵权冲突法的完善具有理论和现实意义。This paper aims to study thein Practice and the change of the homeward trend since 2011. This article introduces the proposal and causes of the trend of “going back home”, and then discusses the homeward trend in the application of tort law. This paper is introduced from the introduction of homeward trend and its causes, and then discusses homeward trend in the application of tort law. Based on the discovery of the above situations, this article analyzes the reasons behind homeward trend in the application of conflict of laws in tort, and concludes that the homeward trend should be appropriately limited from the perspectives of cases in Shanghai and internationalization. The thesis concludes that the homeward trend should be appropriately limited. Finally, this thesis puts forward suggestions on the norms of foreign-related general tort conflicts in China from both legislative and judicial perspectives, which is of theoretical and practical significance for the improvement of China’s tort conflict law.
关 键 词:法院地法 “回家去”趋势 涉外一般侵权法律适用
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.14.145.78