检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钟福明
机构地区:[1]广西大学法学院,广西 南宁
出 处:《争议解决》2024年第5期1-7,共7页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:警检关系作为刑事诉讼关系的重要组成部分,对惩罚犯罪与保障人权具有深远意义。我国法制正稳步健全,但警检关系发展过程中仍存在公安机关侦查方式欠妥、检察机关监督乏力、警检配合不充分等问题,不利于保持良好的刑事司法秩序。进入新时代,在以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革推动下,我国应立足本土实际,通过确立检察引导侦查模式、形成“大控方”追诉格局等方式优化目前的警检关系,努力实现刑事诉讼的价值与目标,确保刑事诉讼程序顺利进行。As an important part of the criminal procedure relationship, the relationship between police and procuratorate is of far-reaching significance to the punishment of crimes and the protection of human rights. China’s legal system is steadily improving, but there are still problems such as improper investigation methods of public security organs, weak supervision of procuratorial organs, insufficient cooperation between police and procuratorate, which is not conducive to maintaining a good criminal judicial order and enhancing judicial credibility. In the new era, driven by the reform of the trial-centered litigation system, China should base on the local reality, optimize the current relationship between police and procuratorate mode by establishing the procurator- guided investigation mode and forming the pattern of “big prosecution” pattern, so as to ensure that the value and goal of criminal litigation are realized in an unbiased manner.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.125.201