检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江万里学院法学院,浙江 宁波 [2]西南民族大学法学院,四川 成都
出 处:《争议解决》2024年第5期168-174,共7页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:数据具有权属流动性、非排他性和非物质性等特征,与物权、债权和知识产权都有竞合之处,无法运用传统的单一物权、债权或者知识产权进行保护。因此,以我国民法权利体系为主视角,将数据财产权视为新型权利进行立法确权,并结合物权、债权和知识产权的保护,是我国数据确权的最适合路径。在立法技术上,通过比较法分析和反思我国立法缺陷,思考和分析数据确权工作的具体路径和立法模式,构建符合国情和数据发展的数据财产权模式。Data has the characteristics of ownership liquidity, non-exclusive and non-materiality, and competes with property right, creditor’s rights and intellectual property rights, which cannot be protected by the traditional single property right, creditor’s rights or intellectual property rights. Therefore, from the main perspective of China’s civil law right system, the most suitable path for data property right is to combine the protection of property right, creditor’s right and intellectual property right in China. In terms of legislative technology, through comparative law to analyze and reflect on the legislative defects of China, thinking and analyze the specific path and legislative mode of data right confirmation work, to build a data property right model in line with national conditions and data development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171