检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁慧仪
机构地区:[1]佛山科学技术学院法学与知识产权学院,广东 佛山
出 处:《争议解决》2024年第6期38-44,共7页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:在数字化时代,人工智能技术的不断突破,新技术的出现对传统著作权法体系提出了新的挑战,而AI绘画作为一种新型的艺术创作形式受到社会各界广泛关注。随着AI绘画快速发展及广泛的应用,现行法律体系已无法满足其发展需求,难以全面规制其中的法律风险。本文首先对AI绘画所引发的法律风险进行讨论,其次对人工智能生成物的可版权性进行分析,然后从法理基础和技术依据两方面阐述AI绘画适用法定许可制度的合理性,最后提出规范进路。我们有必要在现有立法的基础上,考虑将法定许可制度灵活应用于AI绘画创作活动中,以适应技术发展的同时确保著作权的合理保护。In the digital era, the continuous breakthrough of artificial intelligence technology and the emergence of new technologies pose new challenges to the traditional copyright law system, while AI painting, as a new form of artistic creation, has attracted wide attention from all walks of life. With the rapid development and wide application of AI painting, the current legal system has been unable to meet its development needs, and it is difficult to fully regulate the legal risks. Firstly, this paper discusses the legal risk caused by AI painting, secondly analyzes the copyright of artificial intelligence products, then expounds the rationality of AI painting applying legal license system from two aspects of legal basis and technical basis, and finally puts forward a standardized approach. It is necessary for us to consider the flexible application of statutory licensing system to AI painting creation activities on the basis of existing legislation, so as to adapt to the development of technology and ensure the reasonable protection of copyright.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.71