检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张相玉
机构地区:[1]新疆财经大学法学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐
出 处:《争议解决》2024年第6期94-98,共5页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:《中华人民共和国公司法(2018修正)》以下简称《公司法》(2018修正),规定了股东提案权的内容,但在具体实践中出现一系列问题和纠纷。在中华人民共和国公司法(2023修订)以下简称《公司法》(2023修订)中,对于股东提案权的内容做出修改。“股东提案权”这一权利,对于促进我国公司民主决策、协调股东和董事之间的关系以及维护股东的合法权益等具有重要作用。本文具体分析《公司法》(2018修正)中对于股东提案权的相关规定存在的问题,剖析问题出现的原因,同时结合我国的社会实践,参考域外立法经验,具体说明《公司法》(2023修订)中对于股东提案权做出修改的合理性。同时对于股东提案权的进一步完善提出建议。The “Company Law of the People’s Republic of China” (2018 Amendment), hereinafter referred to as the “Company Law” (2018 Amendment), stipulates the content of shareholders’ right to propose, but there are a series of problems and disputes in specific practice. In the “Company Law of the People’s Republic of China” (2023 Amendment), hereinafter referred to as the “Company Law” (2023 Amendment), the content of shareholders’ right to propose is amended. The right of shareholder’s proposal plays an important role in promoting the democratic decision-making of Chinese companies, coordinating the relationship between shareholders and directors and safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of shareholders. This paper specifically analyzes the problems existing in the relevant provisions on shareholders’ proposal right in the “Company Law” (2018 Amendment), analyzes the causes of the problems, and at the same time, combined with China’s social practice and reference to foreign legislative experience, concretely explains the rationality of the amendment on shareholders’ proposal right in the “Company Law” (2023 Amendment). At the same time, further improvement of shareholders’ proposal right is proposed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28