电商商家标错价格构成重大误解的认定——基于裁判文书的案例分析  

Determination of Significant Misunderstanding in Cases of Mispriced Goods by E-Commerce Merchants—Case Analysis Based on Judicial Documents

作　　者：黄俊坚 

机构地区：[1]澳门科技大学法学院,澳门

出　　处：《争议解决》2024年第8期153-159,共7页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：为了重新厘清重大误解适用的认定标准,文章以刊登在《人民法院案例选》2020年第3辑的关于重大误解的典型案例“赵某诉芭莎珠宝(深圳)有限公司网络购物合同纠纷案”作为研究的样本。借此案例展开关于重大误解的学术研究,分别从理论与实践的视角出发,继而得出了重大误解的适用必须满足以下三点:1) 符合意思表示错误的认定;2) 符合重大误解的主客观标准;3) 不应以相对人的主观善恶作为是否适用重大误解的必要条件。进而解释了关于重大误解的构成要件,进一步充实了该领域的研究成果。To clarify the criteria for applying significant misunderstanding, the article uses the case “Zhao v. Bazaar Jewelry (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Online Shopping Contract Dispute”, published in the 2020 Issue 3 of “People’s Court Case Selection”, as a research sample. This case serves as the basis for an academic study on significant misunderstanding, examining both theoretical and practical perspectives. The study concludes that the application of significant misunderstanding must meet the following three criteria: 1) it conforms to the determination of an expression of intent error;2) it meets the objective and subjective standards of significant misunderstanding;3) it should not depend on the subjective good or bad faith of the counterparty. This thus explains the constitutive elements of significant misunderstanding and further enriches the research in this field.

关 键 词：重大误解 表示错误 标错价格 商家 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]