《纽约公约》项下仲裁裁决在中国承认与执行面临的困境与解决出路  

Dilemmas Faced by the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards under the New York Convention in China and Ways to Resolve Them

作　　者：晁双双 

机构地区：[1]上海政法学院国际法学院,上海

出　　处：《争议解决》2024年第8期216-222,共7页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：1958年,联合国通过《关于承认及执行外国仲裁裁决公约》(下称《纽约公约》),旨在要求各缔约方按照国际标准承认与执行仲裁协议和外国仲裁裁决,这为仲裁裁决在他国的承认与执行提供了国际法保障。我国在加入《纽约公约》时作出了商事保留和互惠保留,因此本文所称“《纽约公约》项下仲裁裁决”仅指在其他缔约国领土内作出的商事仲裁裁决。我国在加入《纽约公约》近四十年来,对外国仲裁裁决的承认及执行的效果较为可观。但是,在整体态势向好之下,司法实践中也涌现出较多适用难题。作为第一本由最高人民法院法官撰写的从人民法院司法实践的视角专门研究国际商事仲裁裁决之承认与执行的书籍,《中国内地司法实践视角下的〈纽约公约〉问题研究》一书综合运用了历史、比较和实证的方法,以中国法院的具体实践为落脚点,全方位地对国际商事仲裁中的重点问题进行了分析和研究。本文拟在此框架下探讨《纽约公约》项下仲裁裁决在中国的承认与执行面临的困境与解决出路。In 1958, the United Nations adopted the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (hereinafter referred to as the New York Convention), which aims to require the parties to recognize and enforce arbitration agreements and foreign arbitral awards in accordance with international standards, thus providing international law safeguards for the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards in other countries. China made a commercial reservation and a reciprocity reservation when it acceded to the New York Convention, so the term “arbitral awards under the New York Convention” in this article refers only to commercial arbitral awards made in the territories of other contracting states. In the nearly forty years since China acceded to the New York Convention, the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards has achiev

关 键 词：国际商事仲裁 公共政策 临时仲裁 承认 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]