检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:矫露露
机构地区:[1]青岛大学法学院,山东 青岛
出 处:《争议解决》2024年第11期177-182,共6页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:互联网的迅速发展使得人工智能技术突飞猛进,作为其核心的算法技术的运用范围也越来越广泛。但算法并非中立的,在面对公平与效率时,往往会舍弃公平而选择效率。随着算法的广泛应用,加之算法运行的自身特点,算法歧视愈演愈烈,由于算法的不可解释性及自身存在的一些缺陷,对于平等权的传统保护模式也因此受到危机,传统法律难以应对算法歧视、识别算法歧视存在困难、司法救济途径不畅等问题使得公民的平等权无法得到有效保护。因此,应从健全法律机制、加强算法监管以及保障权益救济等方面进行规制,使之沿着法治的轨道健康发展。The rapid development of the Internet makes artificial intelligence technology advance by leaps and bounds, and the application scope of algorithm technology as its core is becoming more and more extensive. As a technical means of computer programming, it can greatly improve social efficiency and bring many opportunities for the development of human society. But the algorithm is not neutral, in the face of fairness and efficiency, often will abandon fairness and choose efficiency. With the wide application of algorithm and its own characteristics, algorithm discrimination becomes more and more fierce, and the traditional protection mode of equal rights is also in crisis.
分 类 号:TP3[自动化与计算机技术—计算机科学与技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.85