检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周迈
机构地区:[1]青岛大学法学院,山东 青岛
出 处:《争议解决》2024年第11期87-91,共5页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:调解制度基于中国古代“无讼”思想与文化的积淀与传承,成为源于中国的“东方经验”。调解制度在我国诉讼法中有着举足轻重的地位,对中国社会定分止争、化解矛盾与纠纷贡献出了巨大的力量。通常调解制度主要出现在民事诉讼法当中,对于行政诉讼法,目前我国法律尚未明确规定其具体的调解制度。而在当代,社会迅速发展,司法环境日新月异,行政争议的解决不再仅局限于行政诉讼,行政诉讼的调解逐渐走进人们的视野。如何完善我国行政诉讼中的调解制度,使其与社会发展相契合,成为一个亟待解决的问题。As an “Eastern experience” originating from China, the mediation system plays a crucial role in China’s litigation law, contributing greatly to the division, resolution, and resolution of conflicts and disputes in Chinese society. Usually, the mediation system mainly appears in the Civil Procedure Law. For the Administrative Procedure Law, the specific mediation system has not yet been clearly defined in Chinese law. The rapid evolution of society and the ever-evolving judicial system have made it so that administrative disputes can no longer be resolved through litigation alone, but rather, mediation is becoming increasingly popular. How to improve the mediation system in administrative litigation in China and make it compatible with social development has become an urgent issue to be solved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.198.191