计算机软件著作权侵权问题研究  

Research on Copyright Infringement of Computer Software

作　　者：金浩泉 

机构地区：[1]南京理工大学知识产权学院,江苏 南京

出　　处：《争议解决》2025年第2期280-285,共6页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：我国《著作权法》等为计算机软件提供法律保护,但在实际应用中仍存不足。主要问题包括:软件组成要素的保护范围不明确;“实质性相似加接触”规则在侵权判定中的适用性争议以及侵权救济途径的时效性和便利性不足。计算机软件的复杂性对“思想与表达二分法”提出挑战,算法、数据结构等通常被归类为“思想”排除在保护范围之外,但软件程序的结构、顺序和组织因体现“独创性表达”,可纳入保护范畴。域外实践中,“AFC判断法”通过抽象、过滤和比较,更合理地界定了软件著作权保护范围,弥补了测试方法不足。结合我国实际,建议从以下方面完善法律框架:明确软件独创性保护范围,优化侵权认定规则,借鉴国际先进方法以提高司法适用性。同时,加强软件著作权登记与保护机制建设,以提升救济的效率与公信力。China’s Copyright Law and other laws provide legal protection for computer software, but there are still shortcomings in practical applications. The main issues include: unclear protection scope of software components;The controversy over the applicability of the “substantial similarity plus contact” rule in software infringement determination and the insufficient timeliness and convenience of infringement relief channels. The complexity of computer software challenges the dichotomy between ideas and expressions. Algorithms, data structures, etc. are usually classified as “ideas” and excluded from protection, but the structure, sequence, and organization of software programs can be included in protection due to their expression of “originality”. In extraterritorial practice, the “AFC Judgment Method” has defined the scope of software copyright protection more reasonably through abstraction, filtering, and comparison, making up for the shortcomings of similarity testing methods. Based on the actual situation in our country, it is suggested to improve the legal fra

关 键 词：计算机软件 侵权 著作权 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]