标准必要专利纠纷视角下禁诉令与行为保全的兼容性探究  

Exploring the Compatibility of Behavioral Preservation and Injunction under the Perspective of Standard Essential Patent Disputes

作　　者：郑豪 

机构地区：[1]南京理工大学知识产权学院,江苏 南京

出　　处：《争议解决》2025年第3期85-93,共9页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：随着标准必要专利纠纷国际化趋势加剧,禁诉令与行为保全的关系成为重要研究课题。本文聚焦于此,梳理禁诉令从起源到在标准必要专利领域应用的发展历程,明确其分类与反禁诉令的区别。我国行为保全制度在知识产权领域不断完善,为禁诉令实践提供一定基础。禁诉令与知识产权行为保全虽在制度功能、审查标准、法律价值上有共性,但在实体和程序方面差异突出。实体上,禁诉令因涉及国际平行诉讼,考量因素远超行为保全;程序上,其听证和救济程序更为严格复杂。我国在相关领域已有实践经验,应完善禁诉令制度,在现有行为保全规定基础上细化规则,维护司法主权,保障企业权益,提升在国际知识产权纠纷处理中的地位。With the intensification of the internationalization trend in standard essential patent disputes, the relationship between anti-suit injunctions and injunctive relief has become an important research topic. This paper focuses on this issue, sorts out the development process of anti-suit injunctions from their origin to their application in the field of standard essential patents, and clarifies their classification and differences from anti-anti-suit injunctions. China’s injunctive relief system has been continuously improved in the field of intellectual property, providing a certain basis for the practice of anti-suit injunctions. Although anti-suit injunctions and intellectual property injunctive relief share similarities in institutional functions, review standards, and legal values, they have prominent differences in substance and procedure. Substantively, due to their involvement in international parallel litigation, anti-suit injunctions require consideration of far more factors than injunctive relief. Procedurally, their hearing and relief procedures are more stringent and complex. China already has practical experience in related fields. It is necessary to improve the anti-suit injunction system,

关 键 词：标准必要专利 行为保全 禁诉令 反禁诉令 兼容性 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]