检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:施维维
机构地区:[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州 贵阳
出 处:《电子商务评论》2025年第1期2748-2753,共6页E-Commerce Letters
摘 要:数字经济浪潮下,网络交易受到消费者青睐。由于互联网天然的虚拟性和不对称性,网络交易评价成为消费者购买决策的考量因素。目前学理层面和司法实践越发重视评价的重要价值,寻求数字经济时代下消费者新型权益的法律构建。通过文献研究法和比较分析法,发现目前消费者网络交易评价权缺位,不正当评价行为此起彼伏;司法实践中消费者网络评价往往侵及商家名誉,法官的司法自由裁量权行使偏差大;网络交易平台自身的评价机制失衡,确保消费者评价权益的基础欠缺;需要采用“设权 + 行为规制”的入法路径保障消费者网络评价权益,界定评价规则的行使边界,完善网络交易评价自身机制;优化评价规范及算法模型,落实网络交易平台监管责任,积极引入第三方评价机构。Under the wave of digital economy, online transactions are favored by consumers. Due to the natural virtuality and asymmetry of the Internet, the evaluation of online transactions has become a factor for consumers to consider in their purchase decisions. At present, more and more attention is paid to the important value of evaluation at the academic level and judicial practice, and the legal construction of new consumer rights and interests in the era of digital economy is sought. Through literature research and comparative analysis, it is found that there is a lack of evaluation rights for consumers’ online transactions, and improper evaluation behaviors occur one after another. In judicial practice, consumer online evaluation often infringes on the reputation of merchants, and the exercise of judicial discretion by judges is greatly deviated. The evaluation mechanism of the online trading platform itself is unbalanced, and the basis for ensuring the evaluation rights and interests of consumers is lacking. It is necessary to adopt the legal path of “establishment of rights + behavior regulation” to protect the rights and interests of c
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145