检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《地理科学研究》2024年第5期940-947,共8页Geographical Science Research
摘 要:尼罗河流域的古埃及文明与黄河流域的中国文明,作为世界文明的重要基石,其独特的发展路径与内在特征引人深思。本文通过对比分析,揭示了两者在地理环境、农业实践、社会结构以及文化传承上的异同。尽管两者都深受母亲河滋养,但尼罗河稳定的泛滥模式与黄河流域多变的洪水特性塑造了不同的农业模式和水利工程。古埃及的灌溉系统与中国的坝堰体系,反映出对自然环境的适应策略差异。社会结构方面,古埃及的金字塔型结构与中国的封建等级制度,体现了权力分配的迥异。艺术与文化方面,古埃及的象形文字与中国的甲骨文,以及各自丰富的神祇信仰和艺术品,展现了独特的文化风貌。历史发展路径上,古埃及文明的连续性与中华文明的多元融合,体现了各自历史进程的独特性。通过这些对比,本文旨在深化对两大文明的理解,揭示文明发展中的环境影响、社会构建与文化塑造的多元性。The ancient Egyptian civilization in the Nile River basin and the Chinese civilization in the Yellow River basin, as crucial foundations of world civilization, pose intriguing questions with their unique development paths and inherent characteristics. Through comparative analysis, this paper reveals the similarities and differences between the two in terms of geographical environment, agricultural practices, social structure, and cultural heritage. Despite both being nourished by their respective mother rivers, the stable flooding pattern of the Nile River and the variable flood characteristics of the Yellow River basin have shaped different agricultural patterns and hydraulic engineering. The irrigation system of ancient Egypt and the dam system of China reflect contrasting strategies for adapting to the natural environment. In terms of social structure, the pyramid structure of ancient Egypt and the feudal hierarchical system of China demonstrate distinct power distribution. Regarding
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49