检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖北江汉项目管理有限公司,湖北 襄阳 [2]湖北襄投置业有限公司,湖北 襄阳
出 处:《土木工程》2024年第10期1836-1842,共7页Hans Journal of Civil Engineering
摘 要:装配式建筑以其高效、环保的优势,近年来受到了广泛关注和应用。本文以襄阳某项目工程为例,对预制混凝土(Precast Concrete, PC)结构和钢结构两种装配式方案进行了详细的比较分析。研究通过结构经济性、装配率、现场施工及后期维护等方面的综合评估,结合实际施工条件和功能需求,确定了最优方案。研究结果表明,预制混凝土结构在材料成本和施工便捷性方面具有显著优势,而钢结构在施工周期和结构性能上表现优异。最终,本文确定了预制混凝土结构为最优方案,并总结了其在项目中的应用经验,以期为未来类似工程提供参考。In recent years, prefabricated construction has gained widespread attention and application due to its efficiency and environmental benefits. This paper presents a detailed comparative analysis of two prefabricated construction schemes—Precast Concrete (PC) structures and steel structures—using a project in Xiangyang as a case study. The study conducts a comprehensive evaluation based on structural economy, assembly rate, on-site construction, and post-maintenance, taking into account actual construction conditions and functional requirements to determine the optimal solution. The results indicate that Precast Concrete structures offer significant advantages in terms of material cost and construction convenience, while steel structures excel in construction duration and structural performance. Ultimately, this paper identifies Precast Concrete structures as the optimal solution and summarizes the experiences from their application in the project, aiming to provide references for similar future projects.
分 类 号:TU7[建筑科学—建筑技术科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7