检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘祥
出 处:《力学研究》2025年第1期33-41,共9页International Journal of Mechanics Research
摘 要:随着高速列车运行速度的不断提升,空气动力学特性对列车性能的影响日益显著。风洞试验与数值仿真是研究高速列车气动性能的重要手段,但现有研究对网格设计在验证过程中的关键作用缺乏系统性探讨。本文以国内某型高速列车为研究对象,基于STAR CCM+流体仿真软件,结合风洞试验数据,分析了不同网格设计对气动阻力计算结果的影响。通过对比棱柱层网格与切割体网格的设计方案,发现车身棱柱层至少需6层以准确捕捉边界层流动,转向架区域棱柱层设计需与车身网格协调过渡,而车头、车尾加密块对阻力计算结果影响较小。研究结果表明,合理的网格设计可将仿真结果与试验数据的相对误差控制在5%左右,验证了网格优化对提高数值模拟精度的重要性。本研究为高速列车空气动力学仿真中的网格设计提供了参考依据。With the continuous increase in the operating speed of high-speed trains, the impact of aerodynamic characteristics on train performance is becoming increasingly significant. Wind tunnel testing and numerical simulation are important means of studying the aerodynamic performance of high-speed trains, but existing research lacks systematic exploration of the key role of grid design in the verification process. This article takes a certain type of high-speed train in China as the research object, and based on STAR CCM+ fluid simulation software, combined with wind tunnel test data, analyzes the influence of different grid designs on the calculation results of aerodynamic resistance. By comparing the design schemes of prism layer mesh and cutting body mesh, it was found that the body prism layer needs at least 6 layers to accurately capture the boundary layer flow, and the prism layer design in the bogie area needs to coordinate and transition with the body mesh. However, adding dense blocks at the front and rear of the vehicle has a relatively small impact on the resistance calculatio
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7