检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]航天工程大学光电装备系,北京
出 处:《图像与信号处理》2018年第4期191-199,共9页Journal of Image and Signal Processing
摘 要:利用载波相位观测值可以大大提高导航定位精度,但整周模糊度的存在会严重影响结果准确性。本文分析了LAMBDA算法解算整周模糊度的优缺点。针对其构建搜索域导致的搜索时间较长的问题。提出了一种基于长短基线结合的整周模糊度解算算法。通过对比LAMBDA算法与长短基线法解算精确度以及解算速度进行分析对比。通过仿真实验可以看出,LAMBDA法的解算速度相对于长短基线法来说较慢,但是在卫星与接收天线之间呈一定角度时,长短基线法会会大大的提高模糊度解算的误差。本文还粗略地分析了长短基线法引起误差的原因。Carrier phase observation can greatly improve the accuracy of navigation and positioning, but the existence of ambiguity will seriously affect the accuracy of the results. This paper analyzes the ad-vantages and disadvantages of LAMBDA algorithm for integer ambiguity resolution. The problem of constructing search domain leads to long search time. An algorithm of integer ambiguity resolution based on long baseline and short baseline is proposed. By comparing the LAMBDA algorithm with the long baseline method, the accuracy and speed of calculation are analyzed and compared. The simulation results show that the LAMBDA method is slower than the long-short baseline method, but when the angle between the satellite and the receiving antenna is certain, the long-short baseline method will greatly improve the ambiguity resolution error. The causes of errors caused by the long baseline method are also roughly analyzed.
关 键 词:载波相位整周模糊度 LAMBDA算法 长短基线算法
分 类 号:P2[天文地球—测绘科学与技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7