检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄建军
机构地区:[1]重庆三峡学院文学院,重庆
出 处:《现代语言学》2024年第1期548-555,共8页Modern Linguistics
摘 要:上古汉语中“自 + V”结构出现频率较高,本文对《战国策》中的“自”进行定量分析,重点探讨“自”作反身代词时形成的“自 + V”结构。“自 + V”结构主要包含两种类型:一是主谓结构,二是动宾结构,“自”作宾语时宾语前置。同时,本文比较《战国策》时期与现代汉语中的“自 + V”,探讨其词汇化特征:“自”作代词时成词概率更高,并且动宾结构成词化程度远高于主谓结构;“V”相当于二价动词,有着两个论元;从语素分析,“自”与“V”间依然存在主谓与动宾关系;复合词“自 + V”沿用宾语前置句式,因此也含有强调宾语的意义。The “自 + verb” format is usually observed in archaic Chinese. This study focuses on the quantification of the word “自” in Intrigues of the Warring States, with the emphasis on the “自 + verb” format in which “自” served as reflexive pronoun in the sentence. The “自 + verb” format can be divided into two separate categories: subject-predicate structures and verb-object structures. The word “自” will be prepositioned when it serves as the object. Meanwhile, this study compared the “自 + verb” format in Intrigues of the Warring States with those in the modern Chinese to investigate their linguistic features. The research revealed that “自” has a higher lexical probability when used as a pronoun, and verb-object structures are much more common than subject-predicate structures. The verb is inherently equivalent to the bivalent verb, which contains two arguments;In terms of morphemic analysis, there is still a subject-verb-object relationship between “自” and “V”;the compound word “自 + V” follows the object-antecedent syntax, and therefore also contains the sense of emphasizing the object.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49