检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李雪梅
机构地区:[1]吉林大学外国语学院,吉林 长春
出 处:《现代语言学》2025年第1期121-126,共6页Modern Linguistics
摘 要:批评话语分析(Critical Discourse Analysis, CDA)是进行话语研究的重要方法,其中Wodak提出的话语–历史分析方法(Discourse-Historical Approach, DHA)是其主要流派之一。自DHA提出以来,就受到国内学者的广泛研究与关注,成为话语研究的必然趋势。国内学者将该方法的理论应用于汉语语料,使其适用于中国话语的研究,提高了话语–历史分析方法的创新性与可操作性。然而,通过对国内有关话语–历史分析方法的文献进行统计和分类,发现其存在应用范围有限、方法可操作性不足、学科交叉程度较弱等问题。因此,本文将对话语–历史分析方法的主要内容、发展历程、国内研究热点和展望分别进行论述,旨在帮助读者对该方法有深层次的了解,为国内话语–历史分析方法的应用提供参考与借鉴。Critical discourse analysis (CDA) is an important method for conducting discourse research, among which the discourse-historical approach (DHA) proposed by Wodak is one of its main schools. Since the proposal of DHA, it has received extensive research and attention from domestic scholars, becoming an inevitable trend in discourse research. Domestic scholars have applied the theory of this method to Chinese language corpus, making it applicable to the study of Chinese discourse and improving the innovation and operability of DHA. However, through statistical analysis and classification of domestic literature on DHA, it was found that there are problems such as limited application scope, insufficient operability of methods, and weak interdisciplinary degree. Thus, this article will discuss the main content, development process, domestic research topics, and prospects of DHA, aiming to help readers have a deep understanding of this method and provide reference and inspiration for the application of DHA in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117