乡村振兴中的基层政府权责边界:有限与有为的内在逻辑  

The Boundary of Power and Responsibilities of Grassroots Governments in Rural Revitalization: The Internal Logic of Limitation and Promise

作　　者：徐鑫玉 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学政府管理学院,上海

出　　处：《现代管理》2023年第12期1623-1629,共7页Modern Management

摘　　要：全面脱贫之后,乡镇地区转向乡村振兴的战略目标。其中,“治理有效”是农业农村现代化建设的重要保障。然而现实中,基层政府囿于权责不对等、治理边界模糊等原因,陷入“无限政府”的困境,与有为政府的建设脱节。因此,如何化解“无限—无为”的恶性循环是乡镇治理的关键。根据安徽省H镇的调研发现,有限政府与有为政府不是简单的二元对立,而是一个动态的平衡机制。有限政府是实现有为政府的基础,而为警惕诺斯悖论的陷阱,又必须通过有限政府的调节,防止有为政府向全能政府的回归。After being lifted out of poverty in an all-round way, the township areas are making strenuous pro-gress towards the strategic goal of rural revitalization. Among them, “effective governance” is an important guarantee for the modernization of agriculture and rural areas. However, in reality, grass-roots governments are caught in the predicament of “infinite government” due to reasons such as unequal rights and responsibilities, and blurred governance boundaries, which are out of touch with the construction of an effective government. Therefore, how to resolve the vicious circle of “infinity-inaction” is the key to township governance. According to the research in H Town, Anhui Province, it is found that the limited government and the promising government are not a simple binary opposition, but a dynamic balance mechanism. The limited government is the foundation of the effective government, and in order to guard against the trap of North's paradox, it is necessary to regulate the limited government to prevent the effective government from returning to the omnipotent government.

关 键 词：乡村振兴 基层治理 有限政府 有为政府 

分 类 号：F32[经济管理—产业经济]