文化产业高质量发展水平测度及区域差异分析  

Measurement of High-Quality Development Level of Cultural Industry and Analysis of Regional Differences

作　　者：况清清 袁新敏[1] 

机构地区：[1]东华大学旭日工商管理学院,上海

出　　处：《现代管理》2024年第12期3244-3254,共11页Modern Management

摘　　要：作为以文化创造和文化创新能力为核心的综合产业,文化产业具有高附加值、高创意及高市场活力的特征,已成为推动经济高质量发展的重要动力源泉。在此背景下,本文选取2012~2021年我国28个省市的面板数据,采用熵权Topsis、Dagum基尼系数及其分解法,对文化产业在我国的高质量发展水平及其发展差异来源展开探讨研究。结果表明:我国文化产业总体高质量发展水平整体呈现上升的趋势,东部地区最具发展优势;文化产业高质量发展区域差异来源主要来自于区域间差异,且呈逐步缩小态势,但距离高质量发展标准仍有较大差距。据此,论文从培育文化人才、完善公共设施、创新产业发展方式三方面提出相应的优化建议。As a comprehensive industry centred on cultural creation and cultural innovation ability, cultural industry is characterised by high value-added, high creativity and high market vitality, and has become an important source of power to promote the high-quality development of the economy. In this context, this article selects the panel data of 28 provinces and cities in China from 2012 to 2021, and adopts the entropy weight topsis, Dagum Gini coefficient and its decomposition method to explore and research on the high-quality development level of cultural industry and its sources of development differences in China. The results show that the overall high-quality development level of China’s cultural industry shows an upward trend, and the eastern region has the most development advantages;the source of regional differences in the high-quality development of the cultural industry mainly comes from the inter-regional differences, and it is gradually narrowing, but there is still a big gap from the high-quality development standard. Accordingly, the thesis puts forward corresponding optimization suggestions from the aspects of cultivating cultural talents, perfecting public facilities and innovating industrial development me

关 键 词：文化产业 高质量发展 评价体系 熵权TOPSIS法 区域差异 

分 类 号：G12[文化科学]