检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]泉州技师学院交通工程学部(筹),福建 泉州 [2]泉州有志成云电子产品有限公司,福建 泉州
出 处:《现代物理》2024年第6期215-227,共13页Modern Physics
摘 要:近年来,在粒子物理学领域,研究者们发现理论模型所预测的结果与实验观测之间存在着不容忽视的差异。这种现象引发了学术界对现行量子场论方程的有效性和完整性的深入思考。量子场论是现代物理学的基石之一,它在描述微观粒子的行为方面取得了巨大的成功。然而,当理论预测与实验数据不一致时,这不仅仅是一个具体问题的出错,而更可能暗示着现有理论框架中潜在的根本性问题。这种差异可能指向了量子场论的某些基础假设或基本方程需要重新审视的需要。In recent years, in the field of particle physics, researchers have found that the predictions of theoretical models have significant discrepancies with experimental observations. This phenomenon has sparked in-depth academic reflection on the effectiveness and completeness of the current quantum field theory equations. Quantum field theory is one of the cornerstones of modern physics and has achieved great success in describing the behavior of microscopic particles. However, when theoretical predictions do not match experimental data, it is not just a specific problem that has gone wrong, but more likely a hint that there are fundamental issues within the existing theoretical framework that require re-examination. This discrepancy may point to the need to re-evaluate some of the basic assumptions or fundamental equations of quantum field theory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.194.164