检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《护理学》2017年第5期144-147,共4页Nursing Science
摘 要:目的:探讨预知护理干预在胃癌术后放疗患者中应用效果及价值。方法:将2016年1月~2017年2月120例胃癌术后放疗患者作为对象,依据护理方法差异分对照组、预知组两组,各有60例。对照组采用常规护理干预,预知组则给予预知护理干预。比较两组放疗依从性;不良反应发生率;干预前后患者焦虑、抑郁情绪状态、健康状况、社会功能。结果:预知组放疗依从性高于对照组,P <0.05;预知组不良反应发生率低于对照组,P <0.05;干预前两组焦虑、抑郁情绪状态、健康状况、社会功能相近,P <0.05;干预后预知组焦虑、抑郁情绪状态、健康状况、社会功能优于对照组,P <0.05。结论:预知护理干预在胃癌术后放疗患者中应用效果确切,可提高患者放疗依从性,减少不良反应的发生,减轻患者不良情绪,改善其健康状况和社会功能,值得推广。Objective: To study the application effect and value of predicting nursing intervention in postoperative gastric cancer patients with radiotherapy. Methods: 120 cases of postoperative gastric cancer patients with radiotherapy were selected as research objects from January 2016 to February 2017, and were divided in two groups on the basis of nursing method difference, the control group and the predicting group, and each group had 60 cases. Control group were taken care with conventional nursing intervention, and predicting group is given to predicting nursing intervention. We compared radiation therapy compliance, incidence of adverse reactions, the anxiety, depression mood, health, social function of patients before and after the intervention between two groups. Results: Radiotherapy compliance of the predicting group is higher than the control group, P 0.05;the anxiety, depression mood, health, social function of the predicting group patients were better than the control group after the intervention P.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145