认罪认罚后反悔上诉的动机分析  

Analysis on the Motivation of Estoppel Appeal after Pleading Guilty and Confessing Punishment

作　　者：曾凯南 

机构地区：[1]浙江工商大学,浙江 杭州

出　　处：《法学（汉斯）》2022年第6期1030-1034,共5页Open Journal of Legal Science

摘　　要：我国的认罪认罚从宽制度正式确立于2018年新《刑事诉讼法》的颁布之际。实践中日益凸显的问题是一审宣判后,已享受量刑优惠的被告人再度提起上诉。被告人上诉动机主要有“量刑过重”“留所服刑”“谋求减刑”“非自愿性”“信息错位”等五种,明确被告反悔上诉之动机以厘清动机背后的问题所在,检察机关应加强认罪认罚制度的释法说理水平,为值班律师的阅卷及法律信息咨询提供便利,消除被告人的抵触情绪,对于不正当的上诉理由通过抗诉依法予以引导被告人遵守具结承诺,形成良好的司法诉审轨道。China’s leniency system of pleading guilty and punishment was formally established on the occasion of the promulgation of the new Criminal Procedure Law in 2018. In practice, the increasingly prominent problem is that after the sentence of the first instance has been pronounced, the defendant who has enjoyed the sentencing preference will appeal again. The defendant’s appeal motives mainly include five types: “excessive sentencing”, “staying in jail”, “seeking commutation”, “involuntary” and “information dislocation”. It is clear that the motive of appeal against remorse is to clarify the problems behind the motive. The procuratorial organ should strengthen the level of interpretation and reasoning of the system of confession and punishment, facilitate the examination of papers and legal information consultation of the lawyers on duty, and eliminate the defendant’s resistance. For the improper reasons for appeal, the defendant shall be guided to abide by the commitment of signing a contract through the protest in accordance with the law, so as to form a good judicial trial track.

关 键 词：量刑过重 留所服刑 谋求减刑 非自愿性 信息错位 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]