检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜文浩
机构地区:[1]渤海大学法学院,辽宁 锦州
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第1期284-288,共5页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:《民法典》对生命权内涵的扩充引起学界热议的同时,关于危险引入者不作为侵权的民事责任以及一般救助义务的明确化等问题也值得深思。有关见死不救的刑事化问题一直是学界讨论的热点,但对于该类案件中受助者的民事补充责任以及生命权、身体权、健康权的法定救助义务并未深入研究。本文旨在通过对此案的研究,探究危险引入者的救助义务,推动危险引入者救助义务的法定化。The expansion of the connotation of the right to life in the Civil Code has aroused heated discussion in the academic circle. At the same time, it is also worth pondering on the civil liability of the infringer’s omission and the clarification of the general relief obligation. The criminalization of death without rescue has always been a hot topic in academic circles. However, there is no in- depth study on the civil supplementary liability of the recipients in such cases and the legal relief obligations of the right to life, body and health. The purpose of this paper is to explore the rescue obligation of dangerous introducers and promote the legalization of the rescue obligation of dangerous introducers through the study of this case.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7