检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈翠婷
机构地区:[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州 贵阳
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第2期297-300,共4页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:离婚冷静期引发了对离婚自由的争议,而婚姻伦理也正遭受着极端自由主义和个人主义的冲击。从法哲学的视角来看,离婚冷静期制度有着存在的合理性,因为任性的自由并非自由,“人性恶”假设和人性的弱点也佐证了应当对离婚自由进行适度限制。此外,离婚冷静期制度有着其固有的制度价值,既伦理价值与秩序价值。The divorce cooling-off period has aroused the controversy over the freedom of divorce, and the marriage ethics is also under the impact of extreme liberalism and individualism. From the perspective of legal philosophy, the existence of the divorce cooling-off period system is reasonable, because capricious freedom is not freedom, the “evil human nature” hypothesis and the weakness of human nature also prove that the freedom of divorce should be moderately restricted. In addition, the divorce cooling-off period system has its inherent institutional value, both ethical value and order value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.193.1