机械表演权的权利辨析与体系重塑  

Identification of the Rights of Mechanical Performance Rights and System Reconstruction

作　　者：王景淘 

机构地区：[1]烟台大学法学院,山东 烟台

出　　处：《法学（汉斯）》2023年第3期1048-1053,共6页Open Journal of Legal Science

摘　　要：机械表演权的法源依据一直存在争议,且《著作权法》中机械表演权与放映权、广播权及信息网络传播权等权利存在交叉重合的问题尚未得到解决。我国于2001年《著作权法》第10条第1款第9项首次规定机械表演权。《伯尔尼公约》第11条第1款第2项为机械表演权的国际法源依据。应当将放映权并入机械表演权,并修改表演权的定义为“公开表演作品,以及通过放映机、幻灯机、录音机或者录像机等技术设备公开播送作品的表演的权利”。The legal basis of mechanical performance rights has always been controversial, and the problem of overlap between mechanical performance rights and projection rights, broadcasting rights and information network dissemination rights in the Copyright Law has not yet been resolved. Article 10, paragraph 1, item 9 of the Copyright Law of 2001 first stipulated the right of mechanical performance. Article 11(1)(b) of the Berne Convention is the source of international law for the right of mechanical performance. The right of projection should be merged into the right of mechanical performance, and the definition of the right of performance should be revised as “the right to publicly perform a work and to publicly broadcast a performance of a work through technical equipment such as projectors, slide projectors, tape recorders or video recorders”.

关 键 词：机械表演权 法源依据 权利辨析 体系重塑 放映权 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]