检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢馥
机构地区:[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州 贵阳
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第3期1067-1073,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:中国式现代化背景下,随着裁量基准热潮的兴起,环境行政处罚裁量基准作为一种行政自制手段在我国实践中取得良好成效。虽然环境行政处罚裁量基准可以有效解决环境行政处罚自由裁量权滥用的问题,但其在实践中也不可避免地面临一些困境。现阶段,环境行政处罚裁量基准的制定主体尚未明确,制定过程中忽视了环境法基本原则的指引与适用,且缺乏监督机制。鉴于此,本文在行政法理论基础上结合生态环境治理领域内行政处罚的特殊之处,针对以上问题提出了一系列的解决措施,以促进环境行政处罚裁量基准的规范适用及发展,进而加快现代化生态文明体系建设的进程。In the context of Chinese path to modernization, with the rise of the discretionary benchmark boom, the discretionary benchmark of environmental administrative punishment, as a means of administrative self-control, has achieved good results in China’s practice. Although the environmental administrative penalty discretion benchmark can effectively solve the problem of abuse of environmental administrative penalty discretion, it also inevitably faces some difficulties in practice. At this stage, the subject of setting the discretionary benchmark for environmental administrative punishment is not yet clear, the guidance and application of the basic principles of environmental law have been ignored in the formulation process, and there is a lack of monitoring mechanisms. In view of this, this article proposes a series of solutions to the above problems based on the theory of administrative law and the particularity of administrative penalties in the field of ecological and environmental governance, in order to promote the standardized application and development of the discretionary standards of environmental administrative penalties, and thus accelerate the process of building a modern ecological civilization system.
关 键 词:环境行政处罚裁量基准 生态功能 行政自制 环境治理
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33