检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯锦曌
机构地区:[1]天津大学法学院,天津
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第3期1335-1341,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:随着经济社会的快速发展,生态环境污染问题的频繁出现,人们开始注重对生态环境的保护,在这个背景下,环境民事公益诉讼应运而生。环境民事公益诉讼与普通的环境侵权纠纷不同,主要体现在起诉主体的身份上,同时这也关系到环境民事公益诉讼举证责任的分配问题。因此,本文通过对我国环境民事公益诉讼举证责任分配规则的规范和司法适用现状进行梳理,对产生的问题进行原因分析,并在此基础上对我国环境民事公益诉讼的举证分配规则提出相应的完善建议,以期能够更好地保护我国的生态环境和社会公共利益。With the rapid development of economy and society, the problem of ecological environmental pollution occurs frequently. People begin to pay attention to the protection of ecological environment. Under this background, environmental civil public interest litigation arises at the historic moment. Environmental civil public interest litigation is different from ordinary environmental tort disputes. It is mainly reflected in the identity of the litigant, and it also relates to the distribution of the burden of proof in environmental civil public interest litigation. Therefore, this article through to our country civil environmental public interest litigation rules of distribution of evidential burden of norms and judicial application status, an analysis of the causes of problems, and on this basis to our country civil environmental public interest litigation proof the improvement of the distribution rules and put forward the corresponding suggestion, in order to better able to protect the ecological environment and social and public interests of our country.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222