检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:金亦水
机构地区:[1]扬州大学法学院,江苏 扬州
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第3期1845-1851,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:自惩罚性赔偿制度引入知识产权领域以来,学界对其适用规则和运行机制探讨不断。本文自知识产权视域出发,通过阐述商业秘密的深刻内涵,依据现行有效的法律规范及相关司法解释,并结合最高人民法院发布的指导案例,按照惩罚性赔偿之适用条件与计算方法的清晰脉络,正面回答了如何准确适用该规则及如何计算赔偿数额的问题,旨在明确商业秘密侵权的惩罚性赔偿适用标准,以规范和引导社会主义市场经济竞争秩序。Since the punitive compensation system was introduced into the field of intellectual property, the academic circle has been discussing its applicable rules and operating mechanism continuously. From the perspective of intellectual property rights, this paper directly answers the questions of how to accurately apply the rules and how to calculate the amount of compensation by elaborating the profound connotation of trade secrets, according to the current effective legal norms and relevant judicial interpretations, combined with the guidance cases issued by the Supreme People’s Court and in accordance with the clear context of the applicable conditions and calculation methods of punitive damages. The purpose is to clarify the applicable standards of punitive damages for trade secret infringement so as to standardize and guide the competition order of socialist market economy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.131.95.159