监察留置措施中律师介入问题研究  

A Study on the Intervention of Lawyers in the Measures of Supervision and Retention

作　　者：李明亚 

机构地区：[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州 贵阳

出　　处：《法学（汉斯）》2023年第4期2020-2025,共6页Open Journal of Legal Science

摘　　要：伴随监察体制的改革,检察机关的部分权利转移,相应的职务犯罪案件由监察机关实施。同时相应的法律制度随之而来。《中华人民共和国监察法》赋予监察机关在被调查人涉嫌贪污贿赂、失职渎职等严重职务违法或者职务犯罪时符合一定的条件下,监察机关可以对被调查人采取留置措施。留置措施是限制被调查人人身自由的一种严厉举措,但是在《监察法》中并没有律师如何加入留置措施的规定,这一问题是值得探究的。本文通过对律师介入留置措施的必要性进行分析,探讨律师介入留置措施的可行性,希望能够对司法贡献自己一份微薄的力量。With the reform of the supervision system, part of the rights of the procuratorial organs are transferred, and the corresponding job-related crimes are carried out by the supervisory organs. At the same time, the corresponding legal system follows. The Supervision Law of the People’s Republic of China gives supervisory organs the right to take lien measures against the investigated persons when they are suspected of embezzlement, bribery, dereliction of duty and other serious job violations or job-related crimes. The lien measure is a severe measure to restrict the freedom of the person under investigation, but there is no stipulation in the Supervision Law on how to add the lien measure, which is worth exploring. By analyzing the necessity of lawyers’ intervention in lien measures, this paper discusses the feasibility of lawyers’ intervention in lien measures, hoping to make a modest contribution to the administration of justice.

关 键 词：监察委员会 留置措施 可行性 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]