检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广西大学法学院,广西 南宁
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第4期2063-2068,共6页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:全国人大常委会于2021年8月20日出台颁布《个人信息保护法》,但对个人信息保护权的定性还存在争议。个人信息保护权本质是人格权,且主要应用领域是公法领域,自由度相对民事权利较小,带有强制性成分,因此个人信息保护权是一项宪法权利,而不是私权利。但是这项权利的知情同意原则实施效果并不理想,同时,个人信息自决权在应用中受到公权力的限制,公权力机关由此也成为最大的个人信息收集者。为加强作为宪法权利的个人信息权的保护,在行使个人信息自决权时应进行利益衡量,提高“知情同意”行使的有效性,规范公权力机关处理个人信息的行为。The Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress issued the Personal Information Protection Law on August 20, 2021. However, there is still controversy over the nature of the right to personal information protection. The essence of the right to personal information protection is personality rights, and its main application is in the field of public law. The degree of freedom is relatively small compared to civil rights, and it has mandatory elements. Therefore, the right to personal information protection is a constitutional right, not a private right. However, the implementation ef-fect of the principle of informed consent of this right is not ideal. At the same time, the right to self-determination of personal information is restricted by public power in its application, and public power organs have become the largest collectors of personal information. In order to strengthen the protection of the right to personal information as a constitutional right, we should balance the interests when exercising the right to self-determination of personal information, improve the effectiveness of the exercise of “informed consent”, and regulate the behavior of public power in dealing with personal information.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7