论规范性文件审查的审判监督程序——基于《行政诉讼法解释》第151条  

Trial Supervision Procedure for the Review of Normative Documents—Based on Section 151 of the “Interpretation of the Administrative Procedure Law”

作　　者：崔健 

机构地区：[1]浙江工商大学法学院,浙江 杭州

出　　处：《法学（汉斯）》2023年第4期2166-2172,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science

摘　　要：规范性文件审查的审判监督程序是2018年《最高人民法院关于适用的解释》的制度创新规定,规定于第151条。然自该司法解释施行以来,该制度却几乎处于“隐形”状态,在理论研究和司法实践中均鲜有探讨和适用。通过对规范性文件审查制度特征的审视及对该条文规范的解构,在我国现行制度下,是不宜规定由法院依职权以“规范性文件合法性认定错误”为再审事由启动再审的,而可得规定的是由当事人以该事由申请再审,如此才能既符合我国现阶段规范性文件审查的制度内容,又能构建与之相适应的规范性文件审查审判监督程序。The trial supervision procedure for the review of normative documents is an institutional innova-tion in the Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on the Application of the Administrative Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China in 2018, which is stipulated in Article 151. Howev-er, since the implementation of this judicial interpretation, the system has been almost in an “invisible” state, rarely discussed and applied in theoretical research and judicial practice. By examining the characteristics of the review system of normative documents and deconstructing the provisions, under the current system, it is not appropriate to stipulate that the court should start the retrial with the “wrong identification of the legitimacy of normative documents” as the cause of the retrial, but it can stipulate that the parties apply for the retrial with the cause, so as to not only conform to the content of the system of the current review of normative documents in our country. In addition, it can construct appropriate normative document review trial supervision procedure.

关 键 词：规范性文件审查 合法性认定错误 审判监督程序 依职权再审 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]