检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈鹏
机构地区:[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州 贵阳
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第4期2511-2516,共6页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:推进以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革的提出有效解决了以审判为中心理念的缺失,该理念的缺乏是导致司法不公正、公平和损害司法权威的重要原因。以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度改革强调庭审在诉讼中的核心地位和裁判人员的权威性,法官要在庭审中根据证据认定规则来认定事实并以此为基础适用法律和作出判决,要深入贯彻证据裁判原则,确保判决的合法性和合理性,避免出现侦查中心主义,要明确地认识到侦查、审查起诉是为高效以及公正的审判做准备,不能违背司法机关相应的原则,要确实保障庭审的主体性,使其顺利进行。The reform of litigation system with trial as the center has effectively solved the lack of judication-centered concept, which is an important reason leading to judicial injustice, fairness and dam-age to judicial authority. The trial-centered reform of criminal procedure system emphasizes the core status of trial in litigation and the authority of judges. Judges should identify facts in court according to the rules of evidence identification, apply laws and make judgments based on them, thoroughly implement the principle of evidence judgment, ensure the legality and rationality of judgments, and avoid the centralism of investigation. It is necessary to clearly recognize that investigation, examination and prosecution are preparation for efficient and fair trial, and cannot violate the principle of corresponding judicial organs. It is necessary to guarantee the subjectivity of trial and make it go smoothly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13