检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京 [2]河南省汤阴县人民检察院,河南 安阳
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第4期2713-2718,共6页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:“捕诉合一”改革是检察机关为提升诉讼效率而对其内设机构进行的职能调整,这项改革因其可能弱化检察监督等原因而存在正当性层面的争议。从合法性的角度考察,“捕诉合一”改革既不违反现行的法律规则,也不违背回避原则;从合理性的角度考察,“捕诉合一”既体现了公正与效率两大诉讼理念的动态平衡,又实现了检察办案与法律监督的有机统一;从功利性的角度考察,“捕诉合一”提高了检察办案的质量,保障了犯罪嫌疑人的辩护权,提升了检察专业化水平。The reform of integration of arrest and prosecution is the function adjustment of the procuratorial organ in order to improve the litigation efficiency. This reform is controversial in terms of justification, because it may weaken procuratorial supervision. From the perspective of legality, the reform of integration of arrest and prosecution does not violate the existing legal rules or the principle of avoidance;from the perspective of rationality, the reform of integration of arrest and prosecution not only reflects the dynamic balance between the two litigation concepts of justice and efficiency, but also realizes the organic unity of procuratorial case-handling and legal supervision;from the perspective of utilitarianism, the reform of integration of arrest and prosecution improves the quality of procuratorial case-handling, guarantees the right of defense of criminal suspects and improves the level of procuratorial professionalism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90