检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜欢欢
机构地区:[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州 贵阳
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第4期2843-2848,共6页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:人工智能在行政领域的广泛适用,使自动化行政处罚为行政机关治理提供高效便捷的方式,推进了数字政府的进程。但自动化行政处罚在实践运用中存在忽视个人信息、责任确定不清晰和公众对自动化证据收集存疑等问题。针对存在问题提出建设性建议,旨在为自动化行政处罚困境找到规制路径,完善科学理论体系,促进法治政府建设,使自动化行政处罚真正做到高效便民。The wide application of artificial intelligence in the administrative field has enabled automated administrative punishment to provide an efficient and convenient way for the governance of administrative organs and promote the process of digital government. However, there are some problems in the practical application of automated administrative punishment, such as ignoring personal information, unclear responsibility determination and public doubts about automated evidence collection. In view of the existing problems, constructive suggestions are put forward to find a regulatory path for the dilemma of automated administrative punishment, improve the scientific theoretical system, promote the construction of a government ruled by law, and make automated administrative punishment truly efficient and convenient for the people.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15