检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方晨馨
机构地区:[1]宁波大学法学院,浙江 宁波
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第4期2984-2990,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:中国签署《新加坡调解公约》具有现实意义,为“一带一路”商事纠纷解决提供法律保障、促进我国商事调解制度的改革与完善,更提高我国在全球治理中的话语权。但同时我国也面临着《新加坡调解公约》与国内商事调解制度衔接的困境,包括中国调解体系的碎片化、调解员的资质有待提升以及和解协议的执行难度大三个方面。针对当前我国国内调解制度在衔接《新加坡调解公约》存在的困境,进一步提出完善路径,包括构建一套完备的调解体系、提高调解员资质和加强和解协议执行机制三个方面。The Singapore Mediation Convention not only establishes the implementation framework of international commercial settlement agreements, but also promotes the wide application of international commercial mediation mechanisms. China signed the Singapore Mediation Convention to provide legal protection for the settlement of commercial disputes along the Belt and Road, promote the reform and improvement of China’s commercial mediation system, and enhance China’s discourse power in global governance. But at the same time, China is also faced with the difficulties of connecting Singapore Mediation Convention with the domestic commercial mediation system, including the fragmentation of China’s mediation system, the qualification of mediators to be improved and the difficulty of implementing the settlement agreement. In view of the current predicament, the author further puts forward three ways to improve it, including building a complete mediation system, improving the qualifications of mediators and strengthening the execution mechanism of the settlement agreement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28