论侵权责任法回归债法之争  

Discussion on a Dispute of Tort Liability Law Has Returned to Debt Law

作　　者：金苗苗 

机构地区：[1]浙江工商大学法学院,浙江 杭州

出　　处：《法学（汉斯）》2023年第5期3375-3380,共6页Open Journal of Legal Science

摘　　要：民法典对侵权责任的修改引发了侵权责任法是否回归债法之争。支持论注重我国民法典体系与债法体系的形式相似性,反对论更侧重二者的实质差异性。两种观点都具有片面性,但他们对民事立法的科学性与民事权益的保护都有着终极关怀。从这一角度看,如何利用好“债”之凝聚力及债法有关理论,科学构建我国民法典体系与制度,更好保护人们的民事权益,才是值得长期探讨的重要课题。The revision of Civil Code on tort liability has triggered a debate on whether Tort Liability Law has returned to Debt Law. The supporting theories lay emphasis on the formal similarities between Chinese civil code system and debt law system, the opposing theories highlight the substantive distinction between them. Their views are not comprehensive but they have ultimate concern for the scientificity of civil code system and the protection of civil rights and interests. From this point of view, how to make good use of the cohesion of “debt” and the relevant theories of debt law, scientifically construct Chinese civil code system, better protect people’s civil rights and interests is an important issue worthy of long-term discussion.

关 键 词：侵权责任制度 债法体系 民事权益保护 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]