刑罚执行后继续管控:性质、冲突与边界——从《反有组织犯罪法》切入  

Continued Control after Execution of Penalty: Nature, Conflict and Boundary—Starting from the Anti-Organized Crime Law

作　　者：张苡境 

机构地区：[1]浙江理工大学法政学院、史量才新闻与传播学院,浙江 杭州

出　　处：《法学（汉斯）》2023年第5期3938-3947,共10页Open Journal of Legal Science

摘　　要：出于特殊预防目的,《反有组织犯罪法》设立了个人财产报告与从业监管措施,需要对其性质予以明确才能实现有效适用。与此相类似的刑罚执行后继续管控广泛存在于我国立法中,并在过于强调继续管控、报应主义和社会防卫思想下,忽略了与刑罚执行后继续管控价值之间的平衡,以致产生了种类繁多,造成的后果严重,缺乏程序保障等特点。刑罚执行后继续管控应当以帮助犯罪人重返社会为基本引领,在此基础上,将刑罚执行后继续管控的性质厘定为附随性法律后果。消解刑罚执行后继续管控的矛盾,得从遵循比例原则、完善人身危险性评估入手。For special prevention purposes, the Anti-Organized Crime Law establishes personal property reporting and employment supervision measures, which need to be clearly defined in order to achieve effective application. Similar to the continued control after execution of penalty is widely existing in China’s legislation, and under the excessive emphasis on continued control, retributionism and social defense, the balance between the value of continued control after execution of penalty is ignored, resulting in a variety of types, serious consequences, lack of procedural protection and other characteristics. The continued control after the execution of penalty should be guided by helping criminals to return to society. On this basis, the nature of the continued control after the execution of penalty is determined to be an incidental legal consequence. To resolve the contradiction of continued control after the execution of penalty, we must follow the principle of proportion and improve the assessment of personal risk.

关 键 词：刑罚执行后继续管控 保安处分 附随性法律后果 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]