检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许明翠
机构地区:[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州 贵阳
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第5期3971-3975,共5页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:经过20多年的实践与探索,我国离婚损害赔偿制度已经纳入《民法典》,日渐趋于完善,但不可否认该制度仍存在权利主体单一、适用范围狭窄、缺乏同一赔偿标准等缺陷。以我国婚姻观念与法律制度、侵权救济法律体系及制度为前提,对学者提出的建立婚内损害赔偿制度、增加权利主体、扩大义务主体、扩大适用范围、明确赔偿标准等学理建议进行思考与评析,最终否定建立婚内损害赔偿制度与增加权利主体的合理性与必要性,肯定其余学理建议的合理性与必要性。After more than 20 years of practice and exploration, the system of compensation for divorce damages in China has been brought into Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China and tends to be perfect. However, there is no denying that the system is still defective, such as the single right’s subject, limited scope of application, indeterminacy standard of compensation, and so on. Based on the premise of China’s marriage concept, legal system, and system of tort remedies, this paper reflects on and evaluates scholars’ academic suggestions regarding the establishment of a system for compensating marital harm, expanding the rights and obligations of the parties involved, broadening the scope of application, and clarifying compensation standards. Ultimately, the rationality and necessity of establishing a system for compensating marital harm and expanding the rights of individuals are negated, while the rationality and necessity of the other academic suggestions are affirmed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7