检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王锦
机构地区:[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州 贵阳
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第5期4120-4125,共6页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:目前,我国侦查讯问的刑事诉讼法规制仍需要改善。针对侦查讯问的刑事诉讼法规制的研究还缺乏可行性对策,应当对侦查讯问的刑事诉讼法律规制的概况做出进一步解释,同时,针对侦查讯问的刑事诉讼法规制的现存问题提出相应解决方法。本文陈述了沉默权缺失、引诱欺骗方法的缺陷和录音录像制度问题。对该三大问题提出了有效的解决建议,包括强化对录音录像制度的刑事诉讼法引导、对欺骗引诱手段进行合理规制和落实有限范围内的沉默权。At present, China’s legal system of criminal procedure for investigation and interrogation still needs to be improved. The study of the legal system of criminal procedure for investigation and interrogation still lacks feasible countermeasures, and the general situation of the legal regulation of criminal procedure for investigation and interrogation should be further explained, and at the same time, corresponding solutions should be proposed to the existing problems of the legal system of criminal procedure for investigation and interrogation. This article describes the lack of the right to silence, the shortcomings of the method of inducement and deception, and the problem of the audio and video recording system. Effective solutions to these three major problems are put forward, including strengthening the guidance of the Criminal Procedure Law on the audio and video recording system, reasonably regulating the methods of deception and inducement, and implementing the right to silence within a limited scope.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.225.254.235