检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔欣竹
机构地区:[1]浙江理工大学法政学院,史量才新闻与传播学院,浙江 杭州
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第5期4179-4183,共5页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:电信网络诈骗案件中的帮助取款行为可能涉及帮信罪、掩饰隐瞒犯罪所得罪,也可能构成诈骗罪的共犯,对该种行为的刑法定性不能一概而论,应该将帮助取款行为的情况进行类型化区分,结合行为人的主客观要素综合认定。首先,应明确诈骗既遂的标准,进而判断取款人介入犯罪的时间是否符合共犯的成立条件;此外,还需根据取款人明知的内容判断其是否具有希望或放任诈骗既遂结果发生的故意。以此为基础通过片面共犯的理论引入进一步释明帮助取款行为构成诈骗共犯的归责标准。In telecommunication network fraud cases, the behavior of helping to withdraw money may involve the crime of helping to believe, covering up and concealing the crime, or it may constitute an accomplice of fraud. The criminal law nature of this behavior cannot be generalized, so we should classify the behavior of helping to withdraw money and comprehensively identify it with the subjective and objective factors of the actor. First of all, we should make clear the standard of accomplished fraud, and then judge whether the time when the cashier intervened in the crime meets the conditions for the establishment of an accomplice;In addition, it is necessary to judge whether the drawee has hope or deliberately let the accomplished result of fraud happen according to what he knows. On this basis, through the introduction of the theory of one-sided accomplice, it is further explained that helping to withdraw money constitutes the imputation standard of fraud accomplice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.91