检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏宽
机构地区:[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州 贵阳
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第6期4987-4994,共8页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:刑法中的因果关系理论是刑法中的重要理论。作为客观构成要件的因果关系由于司法实践与学说理论的变化经历了传统的条件说、原因说、相当因果关系说到新兴的客观归责理论、危险的现实化理论。传统的条件说因为所得出的因果关系范围过于宽泛而被予以前置化,但是条件说在以往的司法实践中被予以广泛的运用。条件说之后的原因说由于对因果关系的判断标准不明确予以抛弃。相当因果关系说曾一度成为因果关系理论的通说,但随着司法实践中问题的不断增加使得相当因果关系说面临着客观归责理论与危险的现实化理论的挑战。对于刑法因果关系的理论进行梳理期望能找到符合中国司法实践需求的因果关系理论。The theory of causation in criminal law is an important theory in criminal law. As an objective constituent element, causality has undergone traditional conditional theory, cause theory, and considerable causal relationship due to changes in judicial practice and doctrine theory, to the emerging objective attribution theory and dangerous reality theory. The traditional conditional theory has been premised because the scope of causal relationship derived is too broad, but the conditional theory has been widely used in previous judicial practice. The reason after the condition theory is that it is discarded because the criteria for judging causation are not clear. The theory of considerable causation once became the general theory of causation, but with the increasing number of problems in judicial practice, the theory of considerable causation is challenged by objective attribution theory and dangerous realistic theory. The theory of causality in criminal law is sorted out, and it is hoped that a causal theory that meets the needs of China’s judicial practice can be found.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49