检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王镱霖
机构地区:[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州 贵阳
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第6期5402-5412,共11页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:对近年来有关案件的收集梳理显示,目前碳排放报告数据造假问题的治理上还存在立法缺位、治理手段单一、责任体系不清晰等问题。建构碳排放数据造假的环境公益诉讼机制对弥补该领域立法、执法上的不足和完善责任承担体系具有重要意义。需尽快完善环境民事行政公益诉讼并轨的规范路径以保护公共环境利益、激活政府监管职能,为我国气候目标的实现提供助力。The collection and analyzing of relevant cases in recent years shows that there are still problems in the governance of carbon emission report data such as lack of legislation, single governance methods, and unclear responsibility systems. The construction of an environmental public interest litigation mechanism for carbon emission data falsification is of great significance to make up for the shortcomings of legislation and law enforcement in this field and improve the liability system. It is necessary to develop the parallel path of environmental civil and administrative public interest litigation as soon as possible to protect public environmental interests and activate government regulatory functions, so as to provide assistance for the realization of China’s climate goals.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15