通报之公布违法事实的行政可诉性分析——以国家病毒应急处理中心隐私不合规通报案为例  

Administrative Actionable Analysis of the Disclosure of Illegal Facts in Notification—A Case Study of the Privacy Non-Compliance Notification of the National Virus Emergency Response Center

作　　者：胡玉洁 

机构地区：[1]浙江理工大学法政学院、史量才新闻与传播学院,浙江 杭州

出　　处：《法学（汉斯）》2023年第6期5540-5544,共5页Open Journal of Legal Science

摘　　要：通报批评是2021年《行政处罚法》新增行政处罚种类。笔者认为国家计算机病毒应急处理中心对17款App存在隐私不合规情况进行通报,即向社会大众公布案涉17款App的违法事实的行为属于《行政处罚法》规定的行政处罚种类之一“通报批评”。因此本文将从概括主义解释法条、实质性法律效果等方面论证:本案中国家计算机病毒应急处理中心公布相关App的违法事实,此种以降低社会评价和减损名誉为法律效果的行为属于法定行政处罚种类“通报批评”,应当将其置于《行政处罚法》的规制和司法审查“通报批评”,应当将其置于《行政处罚法》的规制和司法审查权审查的范围之内。Circulating criticism is a new type of administrative punishment in the 2021 Administrative Punishment Law. The author believes that the National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center notified the privacy non-compliance of 17 Apps, that is, the act of announcing to the public the illegal facts of the 17 Apps involved in the case was one of the types of administrative punishment stipulated in the Administrative Punishment Law, “circulating criticism”. Therefore, this article will argue from the aspects of generalized interpretation of the law and substantive legal effects: In this case, the National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center published the illegal facts of the relevant App, and this kind of behavior with the legal effect of reducing social evaluation and derogation belongs to the statutory administrative punishment category of “circulating criticism”, and should be placed in the regulation and judicial review “circulating criticism” of the Administrative Punishment Law, and should be placed within the scope of the regulation and judicial review power review of the Administrative Punishment Law.

关 键 词：名誉罚 通报批评 受案范围 公布违法事实 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]